CHARGED WITH NEGLECT YET REDLICK CAN STILL OWN HORSES?

CHARGED WITH NEGLECT YET REDLICK CAN STILL OWN HORSES?

SEIZURE DOES NOT MEAN A BAN ON HORSE OWNERSHIP

Temporary, court-reviewable restrictions on animal ownership until charges are resolved would align animal welfare with protections already accepted in other areas of law.

SERIOUS LOOPHOLE

Sixteen horses were seized from Stephanie Redlick.  (AKA Stephanie Alessia.)

One was so badly neglected he had to be euthanized.

The surviving 15 horses will NOT be returned to her, and taxpayers are left with a bill exceeding $116,000.

Redlick is facing 13 charges under the Animal Welfare Services Act for the alleged mistreatment and abuse of animals.

And yet, under Ontario’s current system, she remains legally able to have horses. AND she is accumulating horses again.

This shocking reality is why this letter-writing campaign exists — to demand changes that actually prevent repeat neglect, not just respond after the damage is done.

In many areas of law, temporary safeguards are routinely put in place once serious charges are laid, not as punishment, but as a precaution.

These measures exist to prevent further harm while the courts determine guilt or innocence. They recognize a simple reality: waiting until after a trial can mean irreversible damage.

For example, individuals charged with violent offences may be prohibited from contacting alleged victims, firearm owners can have weapons seized, professionals may be suspended from practice, drivers can lose licences, and parents may face supervised access — all before a trial concludes.

These are not declarations of guilt; they are risk-management tools designed to protect the public or vulnerable parties during legal proceedings.

Animal welfare should be no different.

When someone faces serious animal neglect charges — especially following large-scale seizures or fatalities — allowing unrestricted ownership or custody of animals during that period creates a foreseeable risk.

Again, temporary, court-reviewable restrictions on animal ownership until charges are resolved would align animal welfare with protections already accepted in other areas of law.

Ontario’s Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act does not currently provide this kind of interim protection. While inspectors can seize animals already in distress and courts may impose prohibitions after a conviction, there is no mechanism that automatically restricts animal ownership or acquisition once serious charges are laid. As a result, enforcement remains reactive rather than preventative — stepping in only after harm has occurred again.

WE’VE REMOVED EVERY BARRIER TO SPEAKING UP 

If you live in Ontario, this push-button tool sends a pre-written letter directly to your MPP and senior elected officials demanding urgent changes to a broken animal welfare system.

ON THE FORM BELOW…

Step 1: Enter your postal code, click Find My MPP

Step 2: Click ‘Send to Premier + Solicitor General + Chief Inspector (CC My MPP)

AFTER you hit send on the form below YOU CAN EDIT the email BEFORE it goes out – or leave it as is.

It takes LESS than 2 minutes.

Take Action Today: Close Ontario's Animal Welfare Loophole

Enter your Ontario postal code to automatically find your local MPP. Then send the letter in one click.

Recipients: Premier's Office, Solicitor General, Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, and your local MPP (auto).

What law needs to change?

  • Automatic "no-own / no-custody" restrictions for repeat or severe neglect cases, especially after a large seizure.
  • Real restrictions while charges are before the court so animals cannot be quietly moved to avoid oversight.
  • Mandatory veterinary orders when an animal is reported injured or in distress.
  • Cost-recovery accountability: if someone owes the province major care costs after seizure, that must trigger restrictions on future ownership/custody.

Bottom line: seizure without enforceable ownership restrictions is not prevention - it's a revolving door.

THE LETTER IN THE FORM READS…

Subject: Close Ontario’s Animal Welfare Loophole: Prevent Repeat Harm

Dear Premier Ford and Minister Kerzner,

I am writing to urge immediate reform to close a dangerous loophole in Ontario’s animal welfare system.

When an individual has had 16 horses seized, one was euthanized due to condition, the animals are not being returned, and taxpayers are owed over $116,000 for care, there must be enforceable restrictions preventing future ownership or custody of horses.

Seizure without ownership restrictions is not prevention. It allows repeat harm and repeats taxpayer expense. Similar temporary safeguards already exist in other areas of law to prevent further harm while charges are before the courts.

I am asking your government to implement reforms so that repeat or severe cases trigger meaningful bans or restrictions on animal ownership, along with timely veterinary orders when animals are reported injured or in distress.

Full details and documentation are available here:

https://banhorseslaughter.com/stephanie-redlick

Sincerely,

[Your Name]
[City]

AND IT GOES TO…

Premier of Ontario
Doug Ford
Premier of Ontario
📧 Email: premier@ontario.ca
📞 Telephone: 416-325-1941

Solicitor General of Ontario
Michael Kerzner
📧 Email: minister.solgen@ontario.ca 
📞 Telephone: 416-426-5000

Chief Animal Welfare Inspector (Ontario)
Melanie Milczynski
Animal Welfare Services, Ontario
📧 Email: Melanie.Milczynski@ontario.ca
📞 Telephone: 416-433-3540

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

HELP BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER IN CANADA & BEYONDCanadians are horrified to see some countries eat dogs & cats, yet in Canada, in a largely unknown business, beloved horses are being tortured and killed for their meat for human consumption - INCLUDING pet horses.Every...

read more
DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

A SECOND EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEMAY 26, 2016: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES
THE ONE WHERE REDLICK ASKS CRYSTAL MITCHELL FOR HELP

THE ONE WHERE REDLICK ASKS CRYSTAL MITCHELL FOR HELP

 FEARLESS WHEN OTHERS BACKED DOWN

Stephanie Redlick, a name we heard for the first time, one year ago today.

IF YOU HAVE NOT READ ABOUT REDLICK’S ABANDONED FOAL WHO DIED – YOU’LL FIND THAT HERE.

Public smearing is a well-used tactic of Redlick’s — one that has previously caused people to retreat and disengage.

In this case, it did not work.

After offering help and having that help accepted, Crystal Mitchell became the target of an aggressive and coordinated smear campaign across numerous Facebook profiles and groups.

The intent was clear: to intimidate, discredit, and force silence.

Crystal Mitchell is fearless – she did not back down.

What makes this episode particularly striking is that several of the allegations Redlick circulated publicly about Crystal are exactly the charges Redlick herself is facing in criminal court.

Redlick’s smear campaign tactic may have worked to silence others. It did not – and is not working this time.

 CAN YOU IMAGINE CRYSTAL’S SHOCK?

Crystal Mitchell had her first conversation with Stephanie Redlick on February 3rd, 2025.

Crystal, her husband Jason, Crystal’s daughter Summer and a friend Celia visited the property Stephanie Redlick was leasing in Oro-Medonte, Ontario over the course of a few days.

This was after Jim Horne tipped them off about the horrific condition of horses, frozen water buckets, lack of shelter for most of the 20 horses, and how the few stalls were piled high with manure.

What ever hay there was, was mouldy which can be deadly for horses and strings were still attached (also can be deadly for horses).

Crystal offered help to Redlick – and Stephanie eagerly accepted that help – admitting that she was in over her head.

And although in a January 2026 Rebel News interview Redlick claimed that Crystal asked Redlick for helpscreen shots of texts show a story that is the polar opposite of what Redlick so boldly stated to Rebel News.

IT TURNED OUT THERE WERE 20 HORSES INCUDING A PREGNANT MARE

SCREEN SHOTS OF REDLICK’S TEXTS TELL THE TALE

When asked how many horses she had, Stephanie Redlick’s response:

It turned out she had 20 horses – after the foal died.  Oh, and keep going, there are a LOT more screen shots below…

“Except the good ones we’d need money for. Ranging from 15-80K.”
– Stephanie Redlick

AN EXAMPLE OF ‘THE GOOD ONES’ 

Again, we say, you be the judge.

Does this look like a healthy horse who is receiving quality care?

Please note the water buckets are blocks of ice, the “bedding” is a foot or more of manure, this poor mare is skin and bones and has sores.

Redlick stated she was going to get $13,000 for her.  Yes, really.

Redlick is currently advertising that she provides first class board – of course the pictures she’s showing are of are a barn she was evicted from and one that is not in Milton as she is advertising – it is 100 kiometers from Milton. 

But we ask you again, does this look like quality care?

BACK TO THE SCREEN SHOTS…
REDLICK IN BLACK & CRYSTAL IS GREEN 

REDLICK ASKS CRYSTAL FOR 20 BALES OF HAY 

Okay so let’s break that down, that is Stephanie Redlick asking Crystal Mitchell if Crystal has any hay.  She is not offering to buy hay, she is expecting FREE hay.

Crystal asks how many bales and Redlick asks for 20 bales.

Again, PLEASE NOTE Crystal Mitchell GIFTS Stephanie Redlick those 20 bales.

Stephanie Redlick also asks if Crystal’s family can help dispose of the dead foal’s body.

Redlick ultimately dragged it to the edge of the property because she didn’t have the money to call a ‘body disposal’ company.

Oh, and Redlick is ‘greatful’.

Wait a minute.  She ‘started’ to rescue at the wrong time?

But Redlick you told Michael Owen of Orillia Matters on May 22nd, 2025 that you’d rescued 150 horses.

Then in January of 2026 you told David Menzies of Rebel News that you’d rescued 1,500 horses.

Yet you started at the wrong time – in February of 2025?

Something sounds a bit fishy.

CRYSTAL GIFTS REDLICK 20 BALES OF HAY 

Redlick calls Crystal her hero.

Stephanie Redlick refers to Crystal’s daughter Summer as “a cool chick”.  (And on that point she is exactly right.  Summer most certainly is “a cool chick”).

Crystal is going home after working all day to load bales of hay to gift to Stephanie Redlick and Redlick is so stressed her head is exploding.

REDLICK DOESN’T EVEN HELP UNLOAD THE HAY 

Redlick claims she did all her chores but also states her stalls are ‘bad’ and asks Crystal not to judge.

BAD?  That’s an understatment.

Horses standing on a foot or more of built up manure – we don’t have the words. Water buckets are frozen solid. But Redlick did ALL her chores?  

Crystal is bringing a gift of hay – Redlick won’t be there to help unload it and Redlick wants it put in the barn.  Yes, REALLY!

Do we believe any excuses Redlick makes?  NOPE.

REDLICK RELINQUISHES 4 HORSES TO CRYSTAL

Jason, Summer and Celia were horrified by what they saw on the property and ultimately Crystal dragged the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) to the property, who were also horrified. The officers took pictures and video and immediately phoned Animal Welfare Services (AWS).

We didn’t know it at the time but AWS inspectors were at the property in  December of 2024 and wrote orders – so Redlick was known to them.

AWS WROTE ORDERS IN DECEMBER 2024

Redlick v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, 2025 ONACRB 168 (Motion Decision released July 25, 2025) Paragraph 18 Exact text (copied word-for-word) “The AWS inspector’s allegations regarding ‘non-compliance’ (December 30, 2024)…
Speaker / source: The Appellant’s counsel (Redlick’s lawyer)

So what are orders? Well, in this case someone delivering horses Redlick bought via an online auction (late in 2024) to a property Redlick was leasing in Oro-Medonte was so horrified by the conditions of the property — and the horses who were already there –that he called the Ontario Provincial Police — who were then forced to involve Animal Welfare Services (AWS).

Animal Welfare Services Inspectors would have visited the property and written ‘orders’ – orders are based on a very low threshold or ‘benchmark’ of what is considered adequate care.

Redlick would have likely been given over a week to comply — or at least prove that she was making progress towards complying.

AWS is known for not being transparent – and that’s a fight that we are prepared to pick up too.

AGAIN, WE KNOW THIS WAS NOT REDLICK’S FIRST RODEO

For the horses to be in such deplorable condition the first of February – AWS definitely dropped the ball.

Again, Crystal and her family and friend were there the first week of February 2025 and AWS was in contact with Redlick as late as December 30th, 2024.

Before Animal Welfare Services showed up in February Crystal managed to convince Stephanie to relinquish 4 horses who were in the most desperate need of medical attention – one of whom was so far gone that an equine veterinarian, a specialist, warned from moment one that he was likely not to survive.

Despite thousands in vet bills and a heroic effort by Crystal and her family, Seattle Sunrise ultimately had to be humanely euthanized.

Crystal, her family and 3 friends all had their names dragged through the mud by Stephanie Redlick – incredibly outlandish claims were made and continue to be made by Redlick about Crystal and others.

REDLICK’S SO CALLED CONTRACT

Remember the contract Redlick bragged to Rebel News she had with Crystal?  The video is here and below you’ll find the so called contract.

Oh, and Redlick has also repeatedly claimed that Crystal stole her horses.  Of course the screen shots and so called contract say differently…

Stephanie Redlick is the one with multiple criminal charges for theft and fraud and 13 animal welfare charges.

This situation highlights both the cruelty some humans are capable of and the compassion of those who choose to step up, take action and show kindness.

Thank you Crystal for being you and for all that you do for so many!

OH AND REDLICK – PLEASE DON’T WORRY…

 When we say we’ve been sitting on the screen shots for a year – we mean that we haven’t shared them publicly till now but Animal Welfare Services has had them the whole time.

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

HELP BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER IN CANADA & BEYONDCanadians are horrified to see some countries eat dogs & cats, yet in Canada, in a largely unknown business, beloved horses are being tortured and killed for their meat for human consumption - INCLUDING pet horses.Every...

read more
DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

A SECOND EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEMAY 26, 2016: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

Pictures and videos on this page are courtesy of Summer Secord, Crystal Mitchell and Celia Carletti.

Press contact: marie@banhorseslaughter.com or phone: 250 801 8231

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

SO NOTORIOUS AN AUCTIONEER REJECTS THEIR BIDS

SO NOTORIOUS AN AUCTIONEER REJECTS THEIR BIDS

A CAUTIONARY ‘TAIL’

On Sunday night, January 25, 2026, I received a Facebook private message.

To be clear, I already knew the advertisement was circulating. But I never mind getting information like that more than once — it’s always better to know than not know, and repetition often confirms patterns.

The message was about a boarding ad being run under the name Stephanie Alessia which of course is one of the many aliases used by the notorious Stephanie Redlick.  The ad was/is offering full board at a barn supposedly located in Milton, Ontario.

The problem was obvious immediately.

The photos being used were of a property in Norwich, Ontario — a barn Stephanie Redlick had been evicted from earlier that same week.

Norwich and Milton are more than 100 kilometres apart, in completely different communities. The ad did not reflect reality.

That, unfortunately, is not a new ploy of Redlick’s.

THE SCAM ARTIST IS STILL AT IT… 

BUT…

What caught my attention was not the boarding offer itself, but the direction of the questions that followed from the person who shared it.

The person messaging me seemed far more interested in two horses that the Redlicks had recently abandoned — where they were, whether Stephanie Redlick would be getting them back, and what was happening with them.

And even when I gave her some information and promised there would be a public post soon, she was persistent.

She wasn’t alone in asking but there was just something in the way she asked – over the course of a few conversations… over  a couple of days.

I responded carefully and truthfully.

Yes, I knew exactly where the horses were.

Yes, they were safe.

And yes, more information would be shared when appropriate.

As the week went on, something about the tone of the messages from the same ‘account’ began to feel off.

The Facebook profile appeared real.

The concern sounded plausible. But the questions circled the same points repeatedly — there was just something that left me feeling uneasy.

THANK YOU TO ALL WHO HAVE REACHED OUT 

At the same time, I was receiving messages from others:

“Stephanie Redick was just here asking about board.”

“She called me about a horse I have for sale.”

“She told me she’s a rescue… a breeder… that she owns a hundred-million-dollar thoroughbred.

[Yes, really!  Just how stupid does Redlick think people are?]

A steady trickle — a few messages a day.

But this particular conversation that started on Sunday evening stood out.

By Thursday, the messages and calls from others began to slow noticeably.

That same day, Stephanie Redlick was scheduled to appear in criminal court — and she did not show up.

A discretionary bench warrant was issued.

Despite Redlick’s repeated claims — including those made during a 15-minute on-camera interview with Rebel Newsthere was no publication ban on those proceedings.

In that interview, Redlick attempted to explain only a portion of what she is accused of, while David Menzies read out just some of the charges on the record: animal neglect, causing distress, 13 Animal Welfare Services (AWS) charges, and multiple criminal charges.

By mid-week, with the sudden quiet, I began to wonder whether Redlick had already found another place to land — another barn to board at, another property to rent, or perhaps I should say one to squat on – because let’s face it –  how many places in the last 2.5 months have the Redlicks been evicted from for non payment?

Eventually, the person messaged me again and sent a screenshot showing that Stephanie Alessia AKA had sent her a friend request.

With a bit of digging, it became clear that this woman – who started sending messages on Sunday night –  was offering full board at a very low rate – and I came to realize that she also hauls horses, as she later told me — “for a living”.

Maybe that explained the persistence?  I was suspicious.

Was she some how connected with Redlick?  Was she planning to either board horses for the Redlicks or haul for them or…?

I continued to be honest.

The mare and foal were safe. They had been examined by a veterinarian. Fecals were done.

A nail that had been left embedded in the mare’s hoof by the last farrier had been addressed.

They were on a feeding program, and the foal — in particular — required extra nutritional support.

Maybe, even if  this person was somehow in communication with Redlick, she didn’t realize that Stephanie Redlick already knew exactly where the 2 horses the Redlicks abandoned were?

A PATTERN OF INTIMIDATION TACTICS 

On the Friday night before that Sunday message, Stephanie Redlick and her father showed up at the farm where the horses are now staying.

They parked on the road outside the property and turned off their lights.

Was this an attempt to intimidate the owners of the property?

The owners confronted them, followed them, and called the police.

The police pulled the Redlicks over and spoke with them.

In rural communities, officers often know the people they serve.

In this case, they  know the farm owners, the amazing charitable work they do, and their impecable reputation.

And with Redlick’s growing list of criminal charges, it does not take long for anyone in law enforcement to know ‘what’ they are dealing with.

By Friday evening – 5 days after the intial contact with the woman who first reached out to share an ad Redlick was (is) running – my gut told me I needed clarity, so I put my phone number into the Facebook Messenger chat. The person who’d been asking questions since Sunday night took the hint and called.

During that call, she let something slip.

“I didn’t offer boarding to anyone else.”

I stopped her immediately.

I thought you said you weren’t offering her boarding — that you wanted nothing to do with her.

She had just contradicted herself.

And if I had to bet, I would say I may have stumbled onto where Redlick was hoping to land next.  Or maybe where Redlick is heading once she secures horses?

I didn’t end that call — she did.

I tried calling her back. She texted that she was on another call. She never returned mine.

The next day, I sent a general message — not a threat, just a boundary.

Anyone who knowingly offers boarding space to Stephanie Redlick, understanding who she is and what she is accused of, will be publicly identified. The same applies to anyone who knowingly hauls horses for her.

If Redlick cannot find a place to keep horses, it becomes much harder for her to acquire them.

If she cannot find anyone willing to haul for her, the same is true.

She responded that this “wasn’t fair,” explaining that hauling is how she makes her living.

What she failed to acknowledge is that many professional and part-time haulers have already reached out to say they will never haul for Redlick again.

Others have said they’ve refused her outright. Some have warned colleagues.

This woman who may have committed to board horses for Redlick, knowing full well who she is – who it appears is willing to haul for her is not the norm, she is the exception.

She also suggested that it would be better to know where the horses are — that this way they could be properly cared for.

What that argument ignores is reality.

Stephanie Redlick does not pay board or rent for barns.

She does not reliably pay farriers, those who deliver hay – or haulers.

She does not cover emergency veterinary care.

When she disappears, barn owners are left holding the bag — financially and legally.

Even when a barn is not offering full board, if horses on that property are neglected, the property owner can be held responsible and charged by Animal Welfare Services.

Feed bills, vet bills, legal fees — all of it lands on the person who believed things would somehow be different.  That maybe they could squeeze some money out of Redlick.

On Saturday, Stephanie Redlick, her father Sammy, and her mother were all present at Ontario Livestock Exchange (OLEX).

We are aware that at least one bid by Sammy Redlick was ignored by the auctioneer. The horse ultimately sold for less than his bid, yet his bid was passed over.

Did you get that? 

A horse had a $200 bid, the auctioneer was asking for $300 – Sammy Redlick, Stephanie’s father was waving and trying to bid $250. The auctioneer ignored his very obvious bid and the horse sold to someone other than the Redlicks for less than what Sammy was willing to bid.

Anyone who has followed Ban Horse Slaughter for any length of time knows we have never been fans of Ontario Livestock Exchange (OLEX), given their long-standing relationship with kill buyers.

But in this instance, credit where it’s due.

Thank you to the auctioneer at OLEX.

He took a stand.  He sent a message.  

That message, that a horse would be better off going to slaughter than into the hands of a known abuser and I think we can safely assume that he’s saying “We don’t want to do business with the likes of you”.]

[And yes, we do know and we are not happy to report that at least one horse bid on by the Redlicks went to a known buyer who ships horses to be slaughtered in Quebec.]

[This auction is separate and distinct from Cookstown Livestock Exchange, where Stephanie Redlick is accused of passing an altered cheque for more than $15,000.]

Stephanie Redlick has multiple upcoming court appearances:

– two jurisdictions for Animal Welfare Services charges

– thirteen counts related to sixteen seized horses

– one horse so far gone that euthanasia was the only humane option

– and two separate sets of criminal charges still before the courts

I’m not going away. Nor are others I’ve been lucky enough to lock arms with.

They know who they are, they are not looking for glory, they have contributed in many ways with more hours over the last year than anyone could ever imagine.

I will continue to track patterns, verify information, and share what can responsibly be confirmed – and again I am not alone in this.

And I want to thank every single person who has stepped forward to say:

“She was here.”

“She called me.”

“I found this ad from Redlick.”

“I saw her there.”

That collective awareness is why horses are safer today than they were last year at this time.

One final note.

The woman with Stephanie Redlick at the auction on Saturday was her mother — the same woman who was present the night a newborn foal was abandoned.

The same woman who promised to stay, to keep the foal warm and fed, in a drafty structure that was little more than a shed.

The foal was dead by morning.

So no — this has never been about just one person.

Please know and get that Stephanie Redlick and her father Sammy Redlick are out and about looking for a place to keep horses AND looking to buy or take free horses.  

Please warn your family, friends and neighbours even if they don’t have horses — or what you would consider a horse property.

We’re doing our best to get the word out but since November 11th, the Redlick’s have managed to take advantage of 3 unsuspecting families – let’s stop them squatting on a 4th property. 

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

HELP BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER IN CANADA & BEYONDCanadians are horrified to see some countries eat dogs & cats, yet in Canada, in a largely unknown business, beloved horses are being tortured and killed for their meat for human consumption - INCLUDING pet horses.Every...

read more
DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

A SECOND EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEMAY 26, 2016: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES
STEPHANIE REDLICK SKIPS COURT

STEPHANIE REDLICK SKIPS COURT

SHE DOES APPEAR TO BE EXTREMELY BUSY

Stephanie Redlick was scheduled to appear in criminal court today.

She didn’t. [More about what being a no show means for her in just a bit.]

Instead, a student lawyer appeared on her behalf, so it does appear that the legal aid certificate approved the day before her last court appearance on this matter was put to use.

The first order of business was delay.

Defence asked for a 12-week adjournment, citing the need to obtain disclosure and prepare the file.

The judge declined. This case is already 8 months old, and the court made it clear it had no appetite for further slow-walking.

Instead, the matter was pushed only one month forward, to February 26.

Then came the consequence of Redlick’s absence.

Because she failed to appear, the judge issued a bench warrant with discretion — a formal legal warning that authorizes police to arrest her if she’s a no show again.

Court patience is clearly wearing thin.

In a recent interview Redlick claimed a publication ban – or as she called it a publication ‘band’ – was in place.

There wasn’t.

The same interview in which she denied presenting herself as a charity.

The record says otherwise.

The same interview in which she deflected responsibility for severely neglected horses.

Authorities seized 16 horses  and laid charges.

And of course she insisted she didn’t apply for legal aid – athough court transcripts from December 18, 2025 show she said in court that she did.

To be fair, she does appear to be extremely busy…

Over the next few weeks alone, Redlick is scheduled to appear in multiple courts across different regions of Ontario, facing two separate sets of criminal charges and two separate sets of animal welfare charges.

FOUR different courts.

She is due back in court as early as February 12, where she is expected to answer to multiple criminal charges in one jurisdiction and multiple AWS charges in another jurisdiction.

It’s going to be interesting to see how she handles being in 2 court rooms on the same day –  in 2 jurisdictions.

She is to return once again on February 26 for the multiple criminal charges she was supposed to appear for today.

Then she is back in court on March 26, to face multiple AWS charges.

4 x multiple sets of charges x 4 different courts!  Calling her prolific is a definite understatement.

Today’s no-show wasn’t just procedural. It was another chapter in an increasingly familiar pattern: confident public claims, quietly contradicted by official records.

We’ll see whether she attends next time — or whether the bench warrant becomes something far less discretionary.

Please know and get that Stephanie Redlick and her father Sammy Redlick are out and about looking for a place to keep horses AND looking to buy or take free horses.  

Please warn your family, friends and neighbours even if they don’t have horses — or what you would consider a horse property.

We’re doing our best to get the word out but since November 11th, the Redlick’s have managed to take advantage of 3 unsuspecting families – let’s stop them squatting on a 4th property. 

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

HELP BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER IN CANADA & BEYONDCanadians are horrified to see some countries eat dogs & cats, yet in Canada, in a largely unknown business, beloved horses are being tortured and killed for their meat for human consumption - INCLUDING pet horses.Every...

read more
DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

A SECOND EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEMAY 26, 2016: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES
STEPHANIE REDLICK’S 2 HORSES ARE SAFE

STEPHANIE REDLICK’S 2 HORSES ARE SAFE

STEPHANIE & SAMMY REDLICK ABANDONED 2 HORSES

Stephanie Redlick is a name many in Ontario’s horse and animal welfare communities have come to recognize — and fear. Her history includes 16 horses seized by Animal Welfare Services, 13 animal welfare charges, and multiple sets of criminal charges (see here and here), yet she remains legally permitted to continue acquiring horses.

On November 11, 2025 Redlick had a mare picked up and transported it to a property she was immediately barred from. Redlick was NOT allowed on the property.

The barn and boarding operation owner provided excellent care for 9 days – which she was not paid for.

On November 20th, 2025 Redlick had that mare hauled to yet another property and along the way a 4 month old colt was picked up.

Redlick – in typical Redlick fashion was immediately barred from that property and only allowed on with an Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) escort.  The rent she promised to pay never materialized.

The horses were hauled away from that property near the end of the month under the custodian clause in the PAWS Act – even though she claimed they were stolen.

That story is here.

The horses then spent 6 days receiving much needed medical attention – no thanks to Redlick – she didn’t pay for any of the treatment or board.

Once again on that property she was only allowed onto the property with an OPP escort.

Next – due to a loop hole – she had them moved to a property on Curries Road in Norwich where the horses were lucky if she checked on them once per day and for at most 2 hours — but the majority of the days she showed up — it was only for 45 minutes to an hour.

Who leaves their horses unchecked for 23 hours per day – or even worse leaves them for 2 days?

After yet again presenting a check that bounced and neither she or her father Sammy Redlick making good on it – Redlick was officially and legally evicted from that property — and the horses considered abandoned.

Don’t worry, the horses are safe. They have been transported to a well recognized and highly regarded facility – where they are getting a full vet work up and all the appropriate care.

We have all the details and will share LOADS more soon – but in the meantime please know and get that Redlick will be looking to buy more horses and to secure another spot to keep them — so please warn your family and friends.

AND yes, she is allowed to accumulate horses even with all the charges against her.

PLEASE help us demand that the loophole in the PAWS Act that allows someone like Redlick to have horses be closed.

Please see the easy to fill out form letter below.

Horse slaughter in Canada is sadly, alive and well — both through the live export of horses for slaughter and through domestic slaughter here at home.

Horses are enduring brutal transport, and Canadians are being exposed to serious food safety risks tied to drugs never meant to enter the human food chain.

Parliament and the Senate had a chance to stop this.

Bill C-355 passed the House of Commons but stalled in the Senate and died when an election was called. That means the cruelty continues — unless Canadians speak up.

We’ve created a done-for-you email that makes it easy to take action in minutes.

Your message will go directly to the Prime Minister, the Minister of Agriculture, Senator Dalphond, and your local MP.

Click below to add your voice and help push for legislation that protects horses and public health.

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

BAN LIVE EXPORT & DOMESTIC HORSE SLAUGHTER

HELP BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER IN CANADA & BEYONDCanadians are horrified to see some countries eat dogs & cats, yet in Canada, in a largely unknown business, beloved horses are being tortured and killed for their meat for human consumption - INCLUDING pet horses.Every...

read more
DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

DEAD ROTTWEILER IN AURORA

A SECOND EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEMAY 26, 2016: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES
NEWBORN FOAL LEFT TO DIE

NEWBORN FOAL LEFT TO DIE

STEPHANIE REDLICK - NEGLECTED HORSES? 

YOU BE THE JUDGE

Originally published February 4, 2025.

Updated February 7, 2025.

JIM HORNE WRITES: 

On Sunday, February 2, 2025, at 4:30 pm I was called by my second cousin’s wife, Dianne Beleskey to ask if I could help Stephanie Redlick whose mare had given birth the night before.

Dianne works at a gas station close to a property that Stephanie Redlick leases and Stephanie came into the gas station to get some water for the mare.

Stephanie Redlick told Dianne the foal was born during the night in a small uninsulated barn in Oro-Medonte, Ontario. The outside temperature was minus 18 Celsius. (Minus 26 with the wind chill factor.)

The newborn somehow got hung up over a chain that goes from a gate to a post at the end of the stall and the foal was stuck there until Stephanie - who lives over an hour away in North York - arrived the next day. 

JIM HORNE CONTINUES: 

Once freed from the gate the foal's back legs were stiff.

I arrived at approximately 6 pm.

When I went into the small barn, which is more of a shed, I saw the mom and her foal.

The stall had about 3 feet of manure in it and the mare was eating hay that was also her bedding.

The baby was uncovered and cold. I immediately got a bottle from Stephanie, fed the foal and asked Stephanie to milk the mother and get more milk to feed the filly.

I covered the foal in blankets and rubbed her.

I squeezed her back legs and was happy to get a response to the pressure.

I lifted her up and she was putting some weight on her back legs but she was not strong enough to keep standing on her own.

I laid her back down and fed her again.

She had a vigorous appetite.

I told Stephanie that the mare and foal needed to go to the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph and that I would arrange for transportation.

Redlick said she couldn’t afford trailering, so I said I would pay for it.

Stephanie’s mother was there as well. I told both of them that they must stay with the baby all night feeding her, keeping her warm and allowing her to sleep between feedings.

I warned them that she would die if they did not do as I asked.

They both agreed to stay all night in their vehicle and care for the foal until I picked her up in the morning.

I received a text from Stephanie around 6:15 am saying she just went back to Toronto (an hour away from the foal) to nap and that I could load her and take her.  [MDB writes: That turned out to be a lie.]

I said she had to be present as I didn't want to later be accused of stealing her.

She then said she had to take her dad to the hospital and would not be able to get back to the barn till later.

I asked her when the foal was last fed. She said 7:15 a.m. which didn't make sense as she sent me a text at 6:15 a.m. that she was an hour away napping - and wouldn't be able to come to the property until later in the morning.  She didn't get to the barn until after 9 a.m.

I looked after my horses and then headed over to the property Stephanie leases to wait for Stephanie and to feed the foal while I waited.

When I got there I could see the baby half covered with the blankets and she had digging marks all around her, made by the mother trying to get her up.

The foal was dead.

Stephanie did not stay the night and texted Dianne during the night to say she didn’t stay because she was too tired.

When Stephanie arrived, I looked at her and told her the foal was dead.

I asked her if she stayed all night and she swore she did and said she fed her every twenty minutes and rubbed her all night to keep her warm.

That didn't make sense based on what she'd texted Dianne Beleskey.

I am including a screenshot (below) of the message Stephanie sent to Dianne on Sunday evening February 2, stating that she'd left.

Stephanie did not appear upset in any way, she Just wanted to know how to dispose of the body. I told her to call a dead stock company but instead after 2 days of the dead foal lying in the stall with the mother, she dragged it to the woods for coyotes to eat.

I would also like to note that inside the "barn" any water buckets were frozen solid and the outside water troughs were empty.

I am haunted by this situation.

Had I known what I was dealing with I would have stayed.

I’m certain the foal would have lived.

At that point, I vowed that this beautiful foal's death would not be in vain and that I would do anything and everything I could to stop Stephanie Redlick from inflicting such cruelty on any other trusting beautiful soul.

Horses only have us to protect them and now after a week of endless phone calls and police visits I am frustrated that it feels like my complaints and concerns are falling on deaf ears.

Jim Horne

FOAL DEATH DUE TO NEGLECT?

AGAIN, YOU BE THE JUDGE

Stephanie Relick sent this text to Dianne Beleskey at 12:03 AM on February 3rd, just after midnight.

Earlier, she had assured Jim Horne that she would stay with the newborn foal throughout the night, ensuring she was fed every twenty minutes and kept warm.

Jim had emphasized that if Stephanie didn’t stay, the foal—who was too weak to stand and unable to nurse from her mother—would not survive.

Despite this, Stephanie appears to have left the barn around 11 PM, possibly even earlier. Again she lives an hour away from where the foal was and she promised to stay the night but she didn't come back till after 9 a.m. the following morning.

As a result, the helpless foal was left alone in the freezing barn. By the time Jim arrived to take the foal to the vet - offering to haul her for Redlick - because she couldn't afford hauling - the foal was dead.

Many people have stayed silent out of fear—because anyone who speaks out about Stephanie Redlick’s behaviour quickly becomes a target.

Her default tactic is to aggressively smear and discredit those who expose the truth. That intimidation has been effective in silencing people and delaying accountability. But when one person is willing to stand firm, it changes everything.

Jim Horne’s willingness to stick his neck out is exactly why we picked up this story. He spoke openly, knowing the personal cost, and refused to back down when others had been pressured into silence. Nor did his neighbour and friend, Crystal Mitchell back down.

Crystal also chose integrity over safety and stood her ground knowing she would be targeted as well. What happened next—and the courage it took to keep going—explains why this story continues, and why it must be told.



You do NOT need a PayPal account to donate through PayPal.

You may make a one time donation or if you prefer set up a monthly donation.

EMAIL for e-transfer or PayPal: 

donations@banhorseslaughter.com

If asked for a security answer please use horses

SPEAK UP - IT TAKES LESS THAN A MINUTE

This 2-click "done for you" email sends a clear message to elected officials that Ontarians will not accept a system that allows repeat harm.

It takes less than a minute — and it puts real pressure on decision-makers to close the loophole that allows Redlick to keep accumulating horses - even after 16 were seized, 13 animal welfare charges were laid - and she owes over $116,000 for their care.

Pictures and videos on this page are courtesy of Summer Secord, Crystal Mitchell and Celia Carletti.

Press contact: marie@banhorseslaughter.com or phone: 250 801 8231

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN...

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

Pin It on Pinterest