STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

COLUMN BY  MONIKA REKOLA

AUGUST 6, 2026: MIDLAND TODAY

At 79, John Dobson had spent decades as a cattle farmer. He hoped the profits from his last herd would help carry him into retirement.

Instead, the Oro-Medonte cattle farmer is preparing to walk into the Midland courthouse next week as a Crown witness in a criminal case he says changed the course of his life.

Nearly two years after an alleged livestock transaction in Tay Township sparked an OPP investigation, Stephanie Redlick, 29, of North York, is scheduled to appear before the Ontario Court of Justice in Midland on Aug. 12 and 14.

Monika Rekola is a columnist with Village Media, a certified landscape designer, and a horticulturist dedicated to ecological stewardship. With a deep passion for gardening and sustainable living, she merges expertise with advocacy, championing environmental conservation, human rights, and animal welfare. Through her writing and design work, she inspires actionable change, fostering harmony between people, nature, and the landscapes they call home.

Contact Ms. Rekola at monika.rekola@gmail.com

JOIN US IN PERSON ON AUGUST 12 & 14, 2026

Stephanie Redlick is scheduled to appear in person in CRIMINAL court on Wednesday, August 12, 2026.

We are asking supporters to join us for a peaceful rally outside the Midland Courthouse to show that our community believes in accountability, transparency, and justice.

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Please arrive no later than 9:00 a.m.

Midland Courthouse

605 Yonge Street
Midland, ON.

Court is scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom T2.

Bring signs and stand with fellow advocates, as members of the public gather before the court proceedings begin.

Please help spread the word and encourage members of the press to attend.

BOUVRY HORSE SLAUGHTER PLANT CLOSED

BOUVRY HORSE SLAUGHTER PLANT CLOSED

SIGNS OF CHANGE BUT THE FIGHT IS NOT OVERThere are signs that Canada’s horse slaughter industry is shifting—and not a moment too soon. But while one door may be closing, others remain wide open. Here's what we know right now: 1. Bouvry’s (Horse) Slaughter Plant in...

read more
STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

COLUMN BY  MONIKA REKOLAAUGUST 6, 2026: MIDLAND TODAY At 79, John Dobson had spent decades as a cattle farmer. He hoped the profits from his last herd would help carry him into retirement. Instead, the Oro-Medonte cattle farmer is preparing to walk into the Midland...

read more
HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

A THIRD EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEJULY 31, 2026: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES

HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

A THIRD EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVE

JULY 31, 2026: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a “done for you fill in the blank email form” — that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change — so that the death of Heiniu is not in vain. (SCROLL DOWN – SEE THE ‘CALL TO ACTION’)

NEED A QUICK OVERVIEW? CLICK THE PLUS SIGN TO THE RIGHT.

A neighbourhood in shock is demanding answers after a lost Rottweiler  died during an interaction with Aurora Animal Services on May 4th, 2026.

What began as a routine call to pick up two stray dogs ended in a scene witnesses describe as traumatic and deeply disturbing.  Earlier in the day, reports were made about two dogs running at large. Community members were able to safely secure both dogs on private property.

Witnesses state the dogs were friendly, calm, leashed, provided water, and showed no obvious signs of aggression while waiting for Animal Services to arrive. (Video available here shows the same.)

When Animal Services attended, one officer loaded the German Shorthaired Pointer into a truck enclosure. Witnesses report that after the dogs were separated, the Rottweiler, named Heiniu became visibly distressed.

Witnesses who are willing to go on the record – allege that what followed was an approximately two-hour struggle involving catch poles with “metal noose-like” restraints while numerous bystanders pleaded with Animal Control officers to stop.

Several witnesses report observing the dog in severe distress, struggling intensely for a prolonged period. Heiniu’s body was transported to an emergency vet clinic by Animal Control/Services officers and the initial vet report states: “Lacerations around neck from leash being imbedded into skin”.  Again, the ‘leashed’ used by Animal Control officers were metal ‘nooses’ on the ends of two catch poles.

The incident ended with the death of Heiniu, a Rottweiler.

This was not an accident.

More details here.

SCROLL DOWN to send a done-for-you email.

TO SEND THE DONE-FOR-YOU EMAIL…

1. Fill out the form BELOW.

2. Click “SEND MY LETTER”.

A pre-written email appears. You can send it as-is or personalize it if you wish.

Your own email program opens with the message addressed to those who can bring about change.

You simply press send within your regular email program.

——–

IF the form does not work for you — you can always scroll down further on the page for a “copy and paste” version of the letter and the email addresses to send it to.

DEMAND FOR APPROPRIATE CHARGES - DEATH OF HEINIU

Add your voice. Complete the form below to send a letter demanding accountability, transparency and appropriate enforcement of the law in the death of Heiniu.

Your letter will go to:

Premier Doug Ford
Solicitor General Michael Kerzner
Chief Animal Welfare Inspector Melanie Milczynski
Attorney General Doug Downey
Chief Paulo Da Silva, York Regional Police
York Regional Police
Mayor Tom Mrakas
Aurora Town Council
Aurora Chief Administrative Officer Doug Nadorozny
East Gwillimbury Council
Georgina Council
Mayor Margaret Quirk
Dan Kuzmyk — Regional Solicitor, York Region

Your Information

Your Letter

I am writing as a citizen of Ontario to demand accountability, transparency and the appropriate enforcement of the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act and Canada's Criminal Code regarding the death of Heiniu. Months have passed since Heiniu died during an interaction with Aurora animal control officers on May 4, 2026. I believe that every animal deserves equal protection under the law and that those entrusted with enforcing our laws must be held to the same standard of accountability expected of every citizen. I also believe many other citizens share this expectation. The death of Heiniu has raised serious questions about the enforcement of animal welfare laws and public confidence in the institutions responsible for protecting animals. Justice cannot depend on who owns the animal, who was involved, or whether those involved are government officials. Animal welfare laws exist to protect animals equally. They must also be enforced equally. If a private citizen were alleged to have caused the death of a dog under similar circumstances, the public would reasonably expect a thorough investigation and, where supported by the evidence, appropriate charges. Why should this case be any different? PROVINCIAL ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES HAS A DUTY TO ACT Municipal animal control officers are not exempt from Ontario's animal welfare laws. Provincial Animal Welfare Services (AWS) has indicated that it is waiting for the Canine Foundations report. However, that review concerns municipal animal control training and protocols. It is not an investigation into whether offences were committed under Ontario's Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act. A review of municipal training and protocols cannot replace—or delay—an independent Provincial Animal Welfare Services investigation into whether Heiniu was caused or permitted to be in distress and whether offences occurred. The question for Canine Foundations is whether municipal training and protocols were appropriate. The question for Provincial Animal Welfare Services is whether Ontario's animal welfare laws were violated. One cannot answer the other. Under the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act (PAWS Act), offences are classified as minor or major. Examples of major offences include: • Causing an animal to be in distress. • Permitting an animal to be in distress. Where the evidence supports an offence, Provincial Animal Welfare Services has the authority and responsibility to investigate and lay appropriate charges, regardless of who is involved. CRIMINAL CODE RESPONSIBILITIES In addition to provincial offences, Canada's Criminal Code also protects animals. Section 445.1(1) states: "Every one commits an offence who wilfully causes or, being the owner, wilfully permits to be caused unnecessary pain, suffering or injury to an animal or a bird." Where evidence may support a Criminal Code offence, Provincial Animal Welfare Services should immediately refer that evidence to the appropriate police service for investigation. In this case, that includes York Regional Police. IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED It is past time for action. I call upon every public authority with responsibility in this matter to fulfill its legal obligations and demonstrate that no individual, public employee or government agency is above the law. PROVINCIAL ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES • Complete a thorough, impartial investigation into the death of Heiniu, independent of the Canine Foundations review. • Publicly release the findings of that investigation. • Lay appropriate charges under the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act where supported by the evidence. • Refer any evidence of potential Criminal Code offences to York Regional Police without delay. YORK REGIONAL POLICE • Review all evidence referred by Provincial Animal Welfare Services. • Conduct an independent criminal investigation where supported by the evidence. • Publicly advise the public when an investigation has concluded, to the extent permitted by law. THE TOWN OF AURORA, THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND THE TOWN OF GEORGINA • Cooperate fully with all investigations. • Preserve all reports, photographs, video recordings, body-worn camera footage, dispatch records, veterinary records and any other evidence relating to this incident. • Publicly disclose what actions each municipality has taken, or will take, to ensure a tragedy like this does not happen again. • Explain whether policies, procedures, training or operational practices have been reviewed or changed as a result of Heiniu's death. • Commit to implementing any additional measures necessary to improve the safety and welfare of animals and maintain public confidence in municipal animal services. THE PREMIER OF ONTARIO AND THE SOLICITOR GENERAL • Ensure Provincial Animal Welfare Services carries out its statutory duties independently and without favour. • Ensure that enforcement of Ontario's animal welfare laws is not delayed or made dependent upon the outcome of a municipal training and protocols review. • Reaffirm that Ontario's animal welfare laws apply equally to every person, every public official and every government agency. • Restore public confidence in Ontario's commitment to protecting animals through fair, impartial and consistent enforcement of the law. Heiniu's death demands answers, accountability and, where supported by the evidence, appropriate charges. No one is above the law. For Heiniu.

Clicking SEND MY LETTER will open your email program with the recipients, subject and letter prepared for you. Please review the email before sending.

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

HAVING TROUBLE SENDING THE LETTER?

If the form does not work with your email program, you can still participate.

Copy the letter below and paste it into a new email.

Use the subject line:

DEMAND FOR APPROPRIATE CHARGES – DEATH OF HEINIU

and the recipient email addresses below.

I am writing as a citizen of Ontario to demand accountability, transparency and the appropriate enforcement of the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act and Canada’s Criminal Code regarding the death of Heiniu.

Months have passed since Heiniu died during an interaction with Aurora animal control officers on May 4, 2026. I believe that every animal deserves equal protection under the law and that those entrusted with enforcing our laws must be held to the same standard of accountability expected of every citizen. I also believe many other citizens share this expectation.

The death of Heiniu has raised serious questions about the enforcement of animal welfare laws and public confidence in the institutions responsible for protecting animals.

Justice cannot depend on who owns the animal, who was involved, or whether those involved are government officials.

Animal welfare laws exist to protect animals equally. They must also be enforced equally.

If a private citizen were alleged to have caused the death of a dog under similar circumstances, the public would reasonably expect a thorough investigation and, where supported by the evidence, appropriate charges.

Why should this case be any different?

PROVINCIAL ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES HAS A DUTY TO ACT

Municipal animal control officers are not exempt from Ontario’s animal welfare laws.

Provincial Animal Welfare Services (AWS) has indicated that it is waiting for the Canine Foundations report. However, that review concerns municipal animal control training and protocols. It is not an investigation into whether offences were committed under Ontario’s Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act.

A review of municipal training and protocols cannot replace—or delay—an independent Provincial Animal Welfare Services investigation into whether Heiniu was caused or permitted to be in distress and whether offences occurred.

The question for Canine Foundations is whether municipal training and protocols were appropriate. The question for Provincial Animal Welfare Services is whether Ontario’s animal welfare laws were violated. One cannot answer the other.

Under the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act (PAWS Act), offences are classified as minor or major. Examples of major offences include:

• Causing an animal to be in distress.
• Permitting an animal to be in distress.

Where the evidence supports an offence, Provincial Animal Welfare Services has the authority and responsibility to investigate and lay appropriate charges, regardless of who is involved.

CRIMINAL CODE RESPONSIBILITIES

In addition to provincial offences, Canada’s Criminal Code also protects animals.

Section 445.1(1) states:

“Every one commits an offence who wilfully causes or, being the owner, wilfully permits to be caused unnecessary pain, suffering or injury to an animal or a bird.”

Where evidence may support a Criminal Code offence, Provincial Animal Welfare Services should immediately refer that evidence to the appropriate police service for investigation.

In this case, that includes York Regional Police.

IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

It is past time for action.

I call upon every public authority with responsibility in this matter to fulfill its legal obligations and demonstrate that no individual, public employee or government agency is above the law.

PROVINCIAL ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES

• Complete a thorough, impartial investigation into the death of Heiniu, independent of the Canine Foundations review.

• Publicly release the findings of that investigation.

• Lay appropriate charges under the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act where supported by the evidence.

• Refer any evidence of potential Criminal Code offences to York Regional Police without delay.

YORK REGIONAL POLICE

• Review all evidence referred by Provincial Animal Welfare Services.

• Conduct an independent criminal investigation where supported by the evidence.

• Publicly advise the public when an investigation has concluded, to the extent permitted by law.

THE TOWN OF AURORA, THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND THE TOWN OF GEORGINA

• Cooperate fully with all investigations.

• Preserve all reports, photographs, video recordings, body-worn camera footage, dispatch records, veterinary records and any other evidence relating to this incident.

• Publicly disclose what actions each municipality has taken, or will take, to ensure a tragedy like this does not happen again.

• Explain whether policies, procedures, training or operational practices have been reviewed or changed as a result of Heiniu’s death.

• Commit to implementing any additional measures necessary to improve the safety and welfare of animals and maintain public confidence in municipal animal services.

THE PREMIER OF ONTARIO AND THE SOLICITOR GENERAL

• Ensure Provincial Animal Welfare Services carries out its statutory duties independently and without favour.

• Ensure that enforcement of Ontario’s animal welfare laws is not delayed or made dependent upon the outcome of a municipal training and protocols review.

• Reaffirm that Ontario’s animal welfare laws apply equally to every person, every public official and every government agency.

• Restore public confidence in Ontario’s commitment to protecting animals through fair, impartial and consistent enforcement of the law.

Heiniu’s death demands answers, accountability and, where supported by the evidence, appropriate charges.

No one is above the law.

For Heiniu.

SEND YOUR EMAIL TO…

Premier Doug Ford
premier@ontario.ca

Michael Kerzner — Solicitor General of Ontario
Minister.solgen@ontario.ca

Melanie Milczynski — Chief Animal Welfare Inspector, Provincial Animal Welfare Services
Melanie.Milczynski@ontario.ca

Doug Downey — Attorney General of Ontario
attorneygeneral@ontario.ca

Chief Paulo Da Silva — York Regional Police
916@yrp.ca

York Regional Police
5820@yrp.ca

Mayor Tom Mrakas — Town of Aurora
tmrakas@aurora.ca

Aurora Town Council
allcouncillors@aurora.ca

Doug Nadorozny — Chief Administrative Officer, Town of Aurora
dnadorozny@aurora.ca

Town of East Gwillimbury — Clerk’s Office
clerks@eastgwillimbury.ca

Town of Georgina — Clerk’s Division
clerks@georgina.ca

Mayor Margaret Quirk — Town of Georgina
mquirk@georgina.ca

Dan Kuzmyk — York Region
Dan.Kuzmyk@york.ca

While we push for accountability, we’re also working to save lives — currently raising funds to support a group of draft cross horses in Ontario who would otherwise have gone to slaughter.  AND to save 4 horses in New Brunswick from being sold to a kill buyer.  Every dollar raised this month will go towards those two projects.

BOUVRY HORSE SLAUGHTER PLANT CLOSED

BOUVRY HORSE SLAUGHTER PLANT CLOSED

SIGNS OF CHANGE BUT THE FIGHT IS NOT OVERThere are signs that Canada’s horse slaughter industry is shifting—and not a moment too soon. But while one door may be closing, others remain wide open. Here's what we know right now: 1. Bouvry’s (Horse) Slaughter Plant in...

read more
STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

COLUMN BY  MONIKA REKOLAAUGUST 6, 2026: MIDLAND TODAY At 79, John Dobson had spent decades as a cattle farmer. He hoped the profits from his last herd would help carry him into retirement. Instead, the Oro-Medonte cattle farmer is preparing to walk into the Midland...

read more
HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

A THIRD EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEJULY 31, 2026: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES

STEPHANIE REDLICK QUEBEC CONNECTION

STEPHANIE REDLICK QUEBEC CONNECTION

JULY 2026:  HOW IS THIS HAPPENING AGAIN?

THE HORSE IN THE PICTURE ABOVE HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED BY AWS

First – a little history when it comes to Animal Welfare Services and their dealings with Stephanie Redlick — who is currently facing multiple animal neglect related charges from 2025.  (July 2026 she has not yet had her day in court.) 

Animal Welfare Services (AWS) knew.

Not in February 2025.

Not after a foal died.

Not after sixteen horses were removed from her so called care.

Not after Animal Welfare Services charges were laid for animal neglect.

Not after 2 sets of criminal charges in 2 jurisdictions were laid for theft and fraud.

AWS knew in December of 2024.

According to Animal Welfare Tribunal transcripts, Stephanie Redlick had already been found NON-COMPLIANT on DECEMBER 30TH, 2024 with Orders issued by Provincial Animal Welfare Services.

For those unfamiliar with the process, an Order is a legal requirement directing an owner to correct deficiencies in the care of animals. If those deficiencies are not corrected to the satisfaction of inspectors and a veterinarian, charges can be laid.

Yet 36 DAYS LATER…

FEBRUARY 4, 2025

Volunteers documented approximately twenty horses in Redlick’s care on a property in Oro-Medonte.

Some horses stood ankle-deep in manure.

Water buckets were frozen.

Horses were picking through their own manure to find something to eat.

Horses were reduced to skin and bone.

Horses had open wounds.

A foal was denied proper care and died.

Outside…

Mouldy hay with baler twine still attached.

No shelter.

No water.

Horses so thin that even those with blankets on – their protruding hip bones and spines could be seen through the blankets.

WHERE WAS ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES? 

How was Redlick — already found non-compliant just weeks earlier — able to still have horses in her so-called care — in horrendous condition and living in inhumane conditions?

FINALLY WEEKS LATER  

Animal Welfare Services seized sixteen horses.

One of those horses also was in such bad shape that euthanasia was the only humane option.

Another mare gave birth after seizure.

Stephanie Redlick now faces multiple animal neglect charges.

The Animal Welfare Tribunal later ruled those horses will not be returned to her.

Redlick has also been ordered to pay more than $116,000 for their care after they were removed and before the Tribunal ruled she was not to get them back.  

Despite losing multiple tribunal appeals Redlick has publicly stated she has no intention of paying.  Don’t take our word for that – watch the Rebel News report where she states that here.

What would have happened if volunteers had not stepped in – what would have happened if there had NOT been a public outcry?

Remember she was found non compliant with requirements to improve the well-being of horses in her care and their living conditions on December 30th, 2024.  And the pictures above are from February 2025.

 

FAST FORWARD… 

JULY 2026:  AWS IS LETTING IT HAPPEN AGAIN 

By late May 2026 we learned that Stephanie Redlick had quietly accumulated another ten horses.

At least four were obtained while she was using the name Marabal Martin (or variations of it).

Why the use of dozens of aliases? (<== Scroll down on that page to see the ones we know about.)

WHY? Because many people in Ontario’s horse community know exactly who Stephanie Redlick is and her reputation proceeds her, they choose to stay clear of her.

According to the owners involved, Redlick promised permanent homes.

She claimed to own 400 acres with streams and lush pasture.

She told elaborate stories involving dying children.

We have screenshots.

We have witnesses willing to speak publicly.

Instead…

Those horses ended up on a Mennonite-owned farm in Holyrood, Ontario.

Not on the property Redlick claimed to own.

The community in which the horses landed is small, a tight knit communtiy and several people came forward to fill in the blanks – every step of the way.  

We are truly thankful to those who came forward.

JUNE 2026

 On June 7, 2026 Redlick was trespassed from the property for non-payment of board. 

She was told she could not return.

The same day four horses obtained by Marabal Martin (Stephanie Redlick) via fraudulent misrepresentation were removed for urgent veterinary attention.

Not by Redlick.

The veterinarian was not hired by Redlick.

The veterinarian was not paid by Redlick.

Poor body scores were recorded and one horse had a puncture wound on her ankle which was NOT being treated.  (We have documentation, vet reports, pictures and even X-rays that were shared with Animal Welfare Services.)

Threats of criminal charges by the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) pushed for by a paralegal representing Redlick followed — if those horses were not returned.

One Ontario Provincial Police officer dug in and would not back down unless the horses were returned. (Others — off the record cheered on those who removed the horses and insisted that it should have been considered a civil matter.)

A few days later the horses were – sadly – returned to the Holyrood property.

Again, we have pictures of the condition of those horses and the veterinary reports which were provided to Animal Welfare Services.

JUNE 8, 2026

Animal Welfare Services attended the property where Redlick at the time had 6 horses.

The Ontario Provincial Police attended.

As far as we know…

No Orders were written. 

We feel confident that we would have been made aware by members of the community had Orders been written.

Despite the condition of the horses and the condition of the property.

Despite Redlick’s history.

No actions on the part of Animal Welfare Services were taken.

Why?  GOOD QUESTION.

Throughout June the OPP reportedly attended the property several more times after Redlick and her father returned despite the trespass notice.

Animal Welfare Services also — as reported by the property owner and neighbours — attended multiple times as June came to an end.

Late in June a Belgian mare gave birth to a mule colt – the colt ultimately died.

(Sound familiar? Remind you of another newborn in the so-called care of Redlick?)

Still NO orders were issued by Animal Welfare Services. 

JULY 12, 2026 – WE TOLD YOU IT WAS HAPPENING AGAIN

On July 12 an experienced horse person known to Ban Horse Slaughter visited the property.

She found one of Redlick’s horses

a Dutch Harness X Standardbred stallion

EMACIATED

standing in manure…

without hay…

without access to turnout…

without proper care.

She was appalled by the condition of other horses and the general living conditions as well.

She immediately contacted Animal Welfare Services.

Only then…

according to multiple sources…

did Animal Welfare Inspectors return with a veterinarian.

Only then according to those in the tight knit community…

were Orders finally written.

 

As of July 25, 2026 the horse in the picture above has not been removed by Animal Welfare Services, instead they chose to leave that horse in the care of the same person who should have never let him get in that condition — and who should have provided better living conditions.

WHY DID SOMEONE OUSIDE OF THE ‘SYSTEM’ HAVE TO REPORT THE CONDITION OF THAT HORSE AFTER MULTIPLE VISITS BY ANIMAL WEFARE SERVICES?

The most common excuse we hear from those inside of Animal Welfare Services is:

There are not enough “equine savvy inspectors”.

Hello.

As someone said to us earlier today:  “Even a Kindergarten student can see that the horse is in desperate need of better care”.

AND do Inspectors not have cell phones with cameras?

Can they not take pictures to share with an equine savvy veterinarian?

THE QUEBEC CONNECTION 

We also believe Stephanie Redlick has found someone in Quebec who is willing to deal with her despite knowing exactly who she is.

Earlier this summer we discovered a riding school in Quebec advertising one of Redlick’s horses for sale.

The advertisement described the mare as a 13-year-old, sound Thoroughbred.

She isn’t.

The mare was NOT in Quebec, at the time the mare was in Ontario and had a lien on her — she is a horse that was relinquished to Redlick under circumstances that were described to us by, both criminal and civil attorneys, as fraudulent misrepresentation.

This mare is a registered Thoroughbred with a lip tattoo. That tattoo proves she is 19 years old, not as the advertisement states – 13.

The advertisement also described her as sound.

She wasn’t.  She isn’t.  She never will be.

By the time this mare was eventually removed from Redlick’s so-called care, her body condition score had dropped to 1.3 out of 5.  (It’s important to note that AWS did NOT step in and remove her.)

Thankfully, she is now safe and receiving the care she desperately needed through a fully registered not-for-profit organization.

When we first saw the advertisement, we honestly thought the owner of the riding school might simply be another victim.

So we called Alexe DeCoste of Lunaria – Services Equins par Alexe (and Mirage Equine Sales)… 

We explained who Stephanie Redlick is.

We directed Alexe to media reports, including reports from CTV NEWS along with information about the Provincial Animal Welfare Services charges, and the criminal charges Redlick is facing.

She told us she already knew all about Stephanie Redlick and believed the Animal Welfare Services case was simply the result of people being jealous of Redlick’s “high-end breeding program.”

Yes, really.

Alexe DeCoste of Lunaria – Services Equins par Alexe refused to remove the advertisement – even though we had proof that the horse was NOT sound.  Remember those vet reports?  The horse being advertised was one of those 4 horses who were vetted after being removed from the Mennonite-owned property on June 7, 2026.  Alexe refused to remove the ad even though the horse was not in Quebec and the horse had a lien on her.

Then things got even more interesting…

We were later contacted by a woman in Quebec who had sent Stephanie Redlick $2,250 for a gelding.

After sending a deposit – but before sending the balance of the funds, that woman started to feel uncomfortable and wonder if she was being scammed — she then reported to us that she received an unsolicited phone call from Alexe, the owner of the riding school — assuring her that Stephanie Redlick was a good person and could be trusted.

The money was sent.
The horse was never delivered.
Like so many others before her, she went to police.

At this point, we can NO longer simply assume that the riding school owner is an innocent victim of Stephanie Redlick.

What we can say is this:

Alexe knows who Stephanie Redlick is.

Alexe knows about the Provincial Animal Welfare Services charges.

She knows about the criminal charges Stephanie Redlick is facing.

Yet, Alexe refused to take the advertisement down and she convinced at least one alleged victim that Stephanie Redlick can be trusted.

AND NOW? 

We know for a fact that Stephanie Redlick is trying to move the 6 horses still in her so-called care to Quebec.

We know she has been looking for someone willing to haul them.

The last person that we know Redlick used to haul horses has now been made aware of who she is — and his response?

“My job is to transport animals. The rest is none of my concern.”

If he chooses to haul for Stephanie Redlick again, we believe the public has a right to know that decision was made with full knowledge of her history.  If he decides to haul for her again we will publish his name.

It’s also interesting to note that hauling of livestock (including horses) is regulated at the federal level by the (Canadian Food Inspection Agency).

The regulations state:

All persons involved in the transport of animals must ensure that every animal being transported is assessed as being fit for the intended trip.”

Does that horse, locked in that stall look like he is fit to be transported from Ontario to Quebec?

The penalties?  Possible criminal charges.

THE BIGGER QUESTION…

As already stated, Redlick  is currently facing multiple animal neglect charges.

Yet while waiting for those charges to make their way through the courts, she has been able to acquire more horses.

Those horses have again become the subject of Animal Welfare Services investigations.

Orders have again been written.

And now those horses may simply be moved by Redlick to another province.

How does that make sense?

How many times do horses have to suffer before there are meaningful consequences?

How many times do Animal Welfare Services inspectors have to write Orders before the law says enough?

This isn’t just about Stephanie Redlick anymore.

It’s about a loophole that allows someone facing multiple neglect charges to continue acquiring horses while their case slowly works its way through the courts.

Until that loophole is closed, this won’t be the last Stephanie Redlick.

There will be another case.

And another.

And another.

The only question is how many horses and other animals will suffer before our laws finally catch up.

If you agree that Ontario’s animal welfare laws need to change, we’ve made it easy to speak up.

 

Our Close the Loophole campaign allows you to send a message directly to the Ontario government asking for one simple change:

If someone is facing serious animal neglect charges, they should not be allowed to acquire more animals until those charges have been resolved.

The current system failed these horses.

Let’s make sure it doesn’t keep failing the next ones.

Take two minutes and send your message today.

 



You do NOT need a PayPal account to donate through PayPal.

You may make a one time donation or if you prefer set up a monthly donation.

EMAIL for e-transfer or PayPal: 

donations@banhorseslaughter.com

If asked for a security answer please use horses

BOUVRY HORSE SLAUGHTER PLANT CLOSED

BOUVRY HORSE SLAUGHTER PLANT CLOSED

SIGNS OF CHANGE BUT THE FIGHT IS NOT OVERThere are signs that Canada’s horse slaughter industry is shifting—and not a moment too soon. But while one door may be closing, others remain wide open. Here's what we know right now: 1. Bouvry’s (Horse) Slaughter Plant in...

read more
STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

STEPHANIE REDLICK CRIMINAL COURT

COLUMN BY  MONIKA REKOLAAUGUST 6, 2026: MIDLAND TODAY At 79, John Dobson had spent decades as a cattle farmer. He hoped the profits from his last herd would help carry him into retirement. Instead, the Oro-Medonte cattle farmer is preparing to walk into the Midland...

read more
HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

HEINIU EMAIL CAMPAIGN

A THIRD EMAIL CAMPAIGN IS NOW LIVEJULY 31, 2026: If you are on this post you are likely looking for a "done for you fill in the blank email form" -- that sends a letter to elected officials and others who can bring about change -- so that the death of Heiniu is not in...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES

SKINNY HORSE ADVERTISED BY AUCTION MART

SKINNY HORSE ADVERTISED BY AUCTION MART

SOMEONE SHOULD DO SOMETHING – RIGHT?

When a photograph of a very thin mare appeared in an advertisement for an Ontario auction recently, the reaction was immediate.

 

People were heartbroken. People were angry. Many commented that “someone should do something.”

Some generous individuals even stepped forward and offered the mare a safe place to land if she could be purchased.

All of those reactions come from a place of compassion. But one crucial step was largely missing from the conversation…

The horse should have been reported to Ontario’s Provincial Animal Welfare Services (PAWS/AWS).

If you see an animal that appears to be suffering, reporting it isn’t about assigning blame or making assumptions. It’s about ensuring that trained Animal Welfare Inspectors are made aware of the situation and can determine whether the animal requires protection or whether an investigation is warranted.

Social media is not an animal welfare agency.

Commenting “someone should help” doesn’t create an official record. Sharing a post doesn’t trigger an inspection. Arguing about who owns the horse doesn’t result in anyone checking on its condition.

A report to PAWS does.

The process is surprisingly simple. It takes only a few minutes to call the toll-free Animal Welfare Hotline and provide the information you have.

Even if you don’t know every detail, your report may provide an important piece of information that helps inspectors assess the situation.

No one is expected to diagnose why a horse is thin. There can be many causes, including age, illness, dental disease, parasites or neglect. That isn’t for the public to determine.

What the public can do is recognize when an animal appears to be in poor condition and alert the people who have the legal authority to investigate.

Every report matters.

Sometimes there is already an open file. Sometimes multiple independent reports help establish a pattern. Sometimes your call is the one that brings an animal to the attention of inspectors for the very first time.

If you’re in Ontario and you believe an animal may be in distress, don’t assume someone else has already called.

Make the call yourself.

It takes about three minutes.

Those three minutes could make all the difference to an animal that has no voice of its own.

IF YOU ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY GIVEN ONE WHEN MAKING THE CALL — ASK FOR A UNIQUE CASE NUMBER (UCN)

Ontario Animal Welfare Hotline

Toll-free: 1-833-9-ANIMAL (1-833-926-4625)

If the situation is an emergency and an animal is in immediate danger, CALL 9-1-1.

Compassion is important. Action is even more important.

P.S.  We reported this situation. BUT we do NOT have eyes everywhere – please don’t wait for us or anyone else to report.  

The UNIQUE CASE NUMBER (UCN) IS:

22320606

T-SHIRTS IN SUPPORT OF HORSE RESCUE FUND 

LIMITED TIME OFFER FREE SHIPPING CANADA & USA 

TO BUY OR NOT BUY HORSES FROM KILL BUYERS

TO BUY OR NOT BUY HORSES FROM KILL BUYERS

WHY IS THERE CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING BUYING HORSES DESTINED FOR SLAUGHTER?

Okay, so we are fully aware that purchasing horses from kill buyers or directly from First Nations bands is controversial.  Some rescues, organizations and individuals are NOT in favour of doing so.

The common objection from those opposed is that when you buy horses from kill buyers - or those First Nations' horses that are earmarked to be slaughtered for their meat - you are helping the kill buyers profit.

Our take is this...

Kill buyers are going to profit whether we buy a horse or horses from them, or not.

Kill buyers will sell the horses to the slaughter plant - either Bouvry in Alberta or (Bouvry is currently closed)  - Richelieu in Quebec - and kill buyers will profit from those sales.

The horses they sell for slaughter are going to go through the torture of being crammed in leg-breaking trucks, often in extreme temperatures and being transported to a slaughter plant -- and if they survive the trip -- they'll be slaughtered for their meat.

If we buy horses, they are spared that torture - and live.

Either way the kill buyer profits - that's why we negotiate the lowest prices we can (never more than what their meat would bring) and buy as many horses as we can.

We are often criticized as are those who have fostered horses with/for us.

THE MORE FOSTER HOMES WE HAVE THE MORE HORSES WE CAN SAVE

Right now we have 6 generous individuals and in some cases families, each with the space on their properties -  and in their hearts -  to take in a few horses each.

Adding a few more horses to a herd of any size, especially when hay prices in western Canada are at an all-time high - and winter will be here before we know it -  is a huge undertaking.

Add in the fact that as mentioned above, critics of buying horses from kill buyers can be brutal with their social media comments and we fully understand why potential foster providers are hesitant and why some choose to remain anonymous.

THANK YOU to all who have stepped forward to help.

Interested in fostering? Please reach out - let's have a discussion to see if fostering would be a good fit for you or not.

 

T-SHIRTS IN SUPPORT OF HORSE RESCUE FUND 

LIMITED TIME OFFER FREE SHIPPING CANADA & USA 

Pin It on Pinterest