Today, Stephanie Redlick’s name surfaced once again at the Animal Care Review Board — the very tribunal responsible for handling cases under the Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act.

Her case appeared before the ACRB because the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector’s request for reconsideration was being decided.

Redlick herself didn’t even bother to submit anything despite being invited.

So while her name was front and center in a provincial tribunal decision released today, she was not standing triumphantly in a courtroom with a legal dream team.  (You, the one she keeps telling everyone she has when she threatens to sue.)

She was simply the subject of yet another official ruling tied to the fallout from her seized horses and her multiple ongoing charges.

Let’s be honest: watching Stephanie Redlick (who this week is trying to hide with the alias Stephanie Alessia) stumble through her own legal disasters is starting to feel like a spectator sport.

She struts around bragging about a “legal team” that seems to exist only in her imagination — unless the Tribunal now accepts invisible ink filings and advice from TikTok commenters.

She bullies, she harasses, she films everything like it’s a low-budget reality show no one asked for, then plays the victim when the consequences land exactly where they belong.

Her credibility evaporates faster than her appeals get dismissed, and every time she opens her mouth, the truth quietly packs a suitcase and heads for the exit.

At this point she’s losing motions with such consistency you’d think the Tribunal had a loyalty program: five dismissals and the sixth one’s free.

Let’s be clear: Today’s ruling does NOT help Stephanie Redlick.

It doesn’t return her animals.

It doesn’t undo the original dismissal.

It doesn’t soften the blow of her 13 Animal Welfare Services charges.

It certainly doesn’t erase the criminal theft and fraud case involving an elderly victim.

All it does is maintain the status quo — which is:

Redlick lost.

The appeals are dead.

The orders stand.

The surviving 15 horses do NOT go back to her.

And that is exactly how it should be.

If anyone is still holding out hope that Stephanie Redlick’s endless legal manoeuvring might somehow restore her credibility, today’s ruling from Tribunals Ontario should put that fantasy to rest.

On December 2, 2025, the Animal Care Review Board released its reconsideration decision in Redlick v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector — and the takeaway is simple:

Once again, nothing Redlick touched held up.

And once again, the system refused to bend for her.

This all stems from Redlick’s failed attempt to challenge the fallout after 16 horses were seized under the PAWS Act.

She tried appealing the Statement of Account, revoking orders, and even demanding the return of the animals. All of it was dismissed months ago.

The reconsideration rules have a high bar, and nothing in this request met it.

Disagreeing with a decision is not grounds for reconsideration.  

The Respondent  didn’t show this alleged legal error would have changed the result anyway.

Complaints about “procedural fairness” were unsupported, vague, and ultimately baseless.

Nice try Redlick – guess you aren’t so smart after all.

If pretending to have a legal team counted as representation you might actually win something!

In short:

The decision stands, because the law was followed — and no amount of creative legal footwork can change the outcome.

For those fighting to keep Redlick away from horses, this ruling is one more confirmation that the system sees through the tactics.

Redlick, you can’t appeal your way out of the consequences when the consequences are the direct result of your own behaviour.

And while tribunals must remain neutral in tone, the reading between the lines is loud:

Nothing in this case suggests Stephanie Redlick had any viable path to getting those horses back.

Nothing at all.

Given Redlick’s history — the seized animals, the 13 animal-welfare charges, the criminal allegations of theft — and of defrauding an elderly man, and the never-ending chaos trailing behind her — that is exactly how it should be.

Ontario’s horses deserve protection from people who have demonstrated, repeatedly, that they cannot provide it.

We’re not going away – her tactics don’t work on us!

We’re not looking away.

And we’re not letting horses like these fall through the cracks again.

If you want to stand with us and help fund the work it takes to expose neglect and provide lifesaving care, donate here.

Together, we make sure the truth isn’t buried — and the horses don’t pay the price.

Unlike Stephanie Redlick, we actually show up, feed horses, and keep our commitments.

If you want to help us continue doing the literal opposite of whatever Redlick professes to do, we’d be grateful for your support.

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.