STEPHANIE REDLICK APPEARED IN 2 CRIMINAL COURTS TODAY 

Stephanie Redlick has spent a great deal of time publicly smearing the names of others and falsely accusing people of being wanted by the police under specific criminal codes.

Today, however, it was Redlick once again on the criminal court docket.

In fact, Redlick had 2 sets of criminal charges before two separate Ontario criminal courts — Midland and Bradford.

Readers may recall that Redlick has already been the subject of multiple Animal Welfare Services charges under Ontario’s PAWS Act, the seizure of 16 horses, and a tribunal ruling ordering her to pay more than $116,000 in care costs for those animals.  Stephanie Redlick is currently facing 13 Animal Welfare Services charges in 2 different jurisdictions…

Today’s court appearances, however, relate to separate criminal allegations under the Criminal Code of Canada.

In all matters today, in both jurisdictions, Redlick was represented by a paralegal appearing as agent for counsel acting under a Legal Aid certificate.

We know, you’re thinking “But she claimed in a recent 15 minute video interview wth Rebel News that she had NOT applied for legal aid”.

Court filings speak louder than her smear campaigns against those who speak out about her.

BARRIE/MIDLAND CRIMINAL COURT APPEARANCE

Let’s start with the Midland CRIMINAL case, which falls under the Barrie/Midland court jurisdiction.

As previously reported by CTV News, the allegations relate to a transaction involving cattle valued at more than $5,000. The victim is 80 years old and is reportedly out over $60,000.

The criminal charges Redlick is facing in Midland/Barrie are:

False Pretences Over $5,000 — Criminal Code s.362(1)(a)

Fraud Over $5,000 — Criminal Code s.380(1)(a)

Theft Over $5,000 — Criminal Code s.334(a)

Forgery — Criminal Code s.366(1)

In plain terms, the allegations involve claims that property worth more than $5,000 was obtained through deception, along with accusations involving fraud, theft, and forged documents.

These charges are moving forward by indictment, which means they are being treated as more serious criminal offences.

If someone is convicted of fraud over $5,000, the maximum penalty under the Criminal Code is up to 14 years in prison.

Other charges, like theft over $5,000 and forgery, can carry potential penalties of up to 10 years.

Redlick did not appear in person at today’s appearance, BUT she will be required to appear in person in criminal court on August 12 and August 14, 2026.

Those hearings are scheduled to take place at the Midland Courthouse, located at

605 Yonge Street,
Midland, Ontario.

Court typically begins at 9:00 a.m., though attendees may wish to arrive a little early as court schedules can change – we’ll update closer to the dates.

Will we see you there?

David Menzies of Rebel News will be there! 

BRADFORD CRIMINAL COURT APPEARANCE

As already mentioned, Stephanie Redlick had a busy day in Ontario’s criminal courts, with matters being addressed in two separate jurisdictions.

In Bradford, Redlick appeared in relation to another criminal matter.

The charges listed before the court were:

Fraud Over $5,000 — Criminal Code s.380(1)(a)

Uttering a Forged Document — Criminal Code s.368(1)

Possession of Property Obtained by Crime — Criminal Code s.354(1)

Forgery — Criminal Code s.366(1)

During the court appearance on March 12, the Crown advised the court that Count 1 — Fraud Over $5,000 — would be withdrawn.

The Crown also confirmed that the case will move forward under the summary conviction provisions of the Criminal Code.

In plain terms, the remaining allegations involve claims related to forged documents and property obtained through crime.

When charges proceed this way, the maximum penalty is generally up to two years less a day in jail, along with possible fines, restitution, or probation.

The matter is scheduled to return to court on March 20 for Trial Scheduling Court, where the next steps in the case — including possible trial dates — will be determined.

The case has already been screened for a two-day trial.

Redlick is not expected to appear in person for that appearance, as it is primarily an administrative scheduling hearing.

We’ll update again before and after March 20th.

REDLICK IS ALSO FACING 13 ANIMAL WELFARE CHARGES

Just in case you are new to this ‘situation’ we think it is also important to note that Redlick is also currently facing 13 unrelated Animal Welfare Services (AWS)  charges under the Provincial Animal Welfare Services (PAWS) Act – in 2 jurisdictions.  Details here.

BECAUSE PUBLIC AWARENESS MATTERS

With two separate criminal cases now moving through two CRIMINAL courts AND two separate unrelated sets of Animal Welfare charges moving through courts in two jurisdictions, we will continue to keep a close eye on each of the cases BUT  having said that…

Public accountability only works when people are willing to pay attention and share what they learn. If this information matters to you, please consider sharing it so others can stay informed as well.

As always, we remain committed to documenting the facts — not because we are picking on one person, but because…

If shining a light on these situations helps bring about improvements inlcuding to Animal Welfare Services in Ontario –  helps deter someone else from making the same choices in the future, then the effort is worthwhile.

— The Team at Ban Horse Slaughter

CHARGED WITH NEGLECT YET REDLICK CAN STILL OWN HORSES?

CHARGED WITH NEGLECT YET REDLICK CAN STILL OWN HORSES?

SEIZURE DOES NOT MEAN A BAN ON HORSE OWNERSHIP Temporary, court-reviewable restrictions on animal ownership until charges are resolved would align animal welfare with protections already accepted in other areas of law. SERIOUS LOOPHOLESixteen horses were seized from...

read more
CURRENT PETITIONS

CURRENT PETITIONS

Horse slaughter in Canada is sadly, alive and well — both through the live export of horses for slaughter and through domestic slaughter here at home. Horses are enduring brutal transport, and Canadians are being exposed to serious food safety risks tied to drugs...

read more

HORSES SLAUGHTERED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Every year thousands of horses are routinely slaughtered in Canada, for human consumption, but you can help us ban horse slaughter in Canada and beyond.

Some of the meat is consumed in Canada, and much of it is shipped to the European Union, and other markets, including Japan.

This barbaric practice is currently not legal in the United States, so horses from the United States are shipped to Canada, and to Mexico, to be slaughtered.

In addition Canada allows for the transportation of live horses to Japan to be slaughtered for human consumption, and unfortunately the transportation of horses destined for slaughter within Canada, and by air to Japan for slaughter, is far from humane.

LEARN MORE HERE <==

We are 100% volunteer & crowdfunded.

0% goes towards salaries. Yes, ZERO.

JOIN ACTOR KATE DRUMMOND &

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD

BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OR ANY PURPOSE
DONATESHOP TO SAVE HORSES

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This